Author's Guidelines

Authors submitting manuscripts to JAHSS must ensure that their work is original, has not been published previously, and is not under consideration by another journal. Submissions should be written in clear academic English and prepared using Microsoft Word format.

Manuscripts should include the following components: title page, abstract (no more than 200 words), 5–10 keywords, introduction, literature review, methodology (where applicable), analysis or discussion, conclusion, and references. APA referencing style must be used consistently.

Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy of citations, adherence to ethical standards, and clarity of argument. Submissions are subject to initial editorial screening followed by a double‑blind peer review process. Manuscripts that do not conform to journal guidelines may be returned for revision before review.

a.   General Requirements

Authors submitting to the Jena Academic Press in JAHSS must ensure that manuscripts:

·         Are original, unpublished, and not under consideration elsewhere.

·         Are written in clear, professional English.

·         Conform to the journal’s thematic focus in the humanities (cultural studies, history, philosophy, art criticism, literary analysis, interdisciplinary humanities, etc.).

·         Are submitted in Microsoft Word (doc/.docx) format.

·         The corresponding author must provide a valid email address and affiliations for all co-authors. Manuscripts should follow the structure detailed below.

b.  Manuscript Layout and Formatting

Authors should prepare manuscripts using the following formatting conventions (adapted for humanities scholarship):

Title Page

·         Title of the article (concise, descriptive, no abbreviations)

·         Author(s) full name(s) (no titles)

·         Institutional affiliation(s)

·         Email address of corresponding author

Main Text Formatting

·         Font: Times New Roman

·         Size: 12 pt

·         Line spacing: 1.5

·         Page margins: 2.5 cm all around

·         Headings numbered using Arabic numerals (e.g., 1., 1.1, 1.1.1)

c.   Title and Abstract

Title:

·         Must be clear, concise, and reflective of the article’s content.

·         Maximum of two lines.

Abstract:

·         Summarizes the research problem, methodology (if applicable), main findings or argument(s), and key contributions.

·         Maximum 150–250 words.

·         Written as one continuous paragraph with no subsections.

Keywords:

·         Provide 3–6 keywords that reflect the main themes of the article.

·         Keywords should be terms that index the article for search and retrieval.

d.    Structure of the Manuscript

JAHSSSS manuscripts should include the following sections:

Introduction

·         Present the research problem, contextual framework, literature basis, and the central thesis or research question.

Literature Review or Theoretical Framework

·         Summarize relevant scholarship, situate the article’s contribution, and define key terms or concepts.

Methodological or Analytical Approach (if applicable)

·         In qualitative or interpretive studies, explain analytical frameworks, data sources, archival materials, or critical approaches used.

Main Discussion / Argument

·         Present the body of the analysis or argument: this may include critical commentary, thematic sections, evidence evaluation, and comparative discussion.

Conclusion

·         Summarize key insights, implications for future research, and broader disciplinary relevance.

Acknowledgments (optional)

References

e.   Tables and Figures

·         Tables and figures should be numbered (e.g., Table 1, Figure 1) and cited sequentially in the text.

·         Titles for tables go above; captions for figures go below the figure.

·         Ensure all visual elements are high resolution and clearly legible.

f.     References and Citation Style

All scholarly references must be accurate and complete. The journal requires a consistent humanities style, such as APA 7th edition.

·         All works cited in the text must appear in the reference list.

·         Avoid referencing materials not directly cited in the manuscript.

·         Authors are encouraged to use citation management tools such as Mendeley, EndNote, or Zotero.

g.    Ethics and Originality

Manuscripts must:

·         Be free of plagiarism.

·         Reflect ethical scholarly conduct.

·         Appropriately acknowledge all sources and permissions for reproduced content.

All submissions undergo plagiarism screening prior to editorial review. Manuscripts failing originality standards will be returned or rejected.

h.    Submission Process

Authors should upload manuscripts via the journal’s online submission portal or submit by email if an online system is not available. The following must be included:

·         Manuscript file (.doc/.docx)

·         Abstract and keywords

·         Title page with author details

·         A brief cover letter (optional but recommended)

Once submitted, authors will receive a confirmation and tracking number for future correspondence.

i.    Peer Review and Revision

At JAHSSSS, we uphold rigorous academic standards through a transparent, fair, and structured peer review process. All submissions undergo evaluation according to internationally accepted scholarly practices to ensure quality, originality, and relevance.

1. Initial Editorial Assessment

Once a manuscript is submitted, the Editorial Office conducts an initial screening to determine whether the submission:

  • Fits the focus and scope of the journal.
  • Conforms to the author guidelines, including formatting, structure, and academic language.
  • Meets basic standards for academic rigor and ethical compliance (e.g., no duplicate publication).

Manuscripts that do not meet these preliminary criteria may be desk-rejected without further review. Manuscripts that pass this stage are forwarded for formal peer review.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

JAHSS employs a double-blind peer review model in which both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other throughout the review process. This approach helps eliminate bias and promotes objective evaluation.

Each eligible manuscript is typically reviewed by two independent experts with subject matter expertise relevant to the manuscript’s content. Reviewers are selected for their academic qualifications, experience in the field, and absence of conflicts of interest.

3. Reviewer Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers assess manuscripts based on clearly defined criteria, including but not limited to:

  • Originality and contribution to the field of humanities.
  • Clarity and coherence of arguments or analysis.
  • Relevance to existing scholarship and literature.
  • Methodological or interpretive rigor, as appropriate.
  • Quality of writing, organization, and formatting.
  • Appropriate citation and engagement with relevant sources.

Reviewers provide detailed evaluations, including constructive feedback and recommendations.

4. Editorial Decision

Based on reviewers’ assessments and recommendations, the editorial team will make one of the following decisions:

  • Accept without revision: the manuscript meets all criteria for publication.
  • Accept with minor revisions: minor changes are required before publication.
  • Revise and resubmit (major revisions): substantive revisions are needed; the manuscript will undergo further review after revision.
  • Reject: the manuscript does not meet the required standards for publication.

Decisions are communicated to the corresponding author, along with reviewers’ comments.

5. Revision and Resubmission

When revisions are requested, authors are expected to respond constructively to reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript within a specified timeframe. Authors must include a response letter addressing each point raised by reviewers.

Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers or to additional reviewers for a second review cycle, particularly in cases of major revision.

6. Final Acceptance and Publication

After satisfactory revision and final editorial approval, the manuscript is accepted for publication. Authors will receive instructions for the final submission, including any formatting corrections, copyright/license agreements, and other pre-publication requirements.

7. Transparency and Confidentiality

Throughout the review process, JAHSS maintains strict confidentiality of reviewer reports and author identities. Reviewers are expected to uphold ethical standards, disclose potential conflicts of interest, and provide objective, respectful feedback.

j.    After Acceptance

Upon acceptance, authors will be advised of the publication timeline and may be required to:

·         Submit a final camera-ready version

·         Authorize license and copyright terms

·         Provide any necessary forms or supplementary documentation.